While in the mist of a philosophical debate with myself (yes, I was winning; thanks for asking), I began to realize that allegories have much the same properties as physics. Grant me the chance to explain.
Introduction of the Foreign
We use allegories to explain concepts that might otherwise be foreign to the listener. Likewise physics allows us to understand how the physical world works; a way to comprehend a complicated or foreign - though nevertheless physical - process (at least within the confines of our determined theories and laws).
Limited Scope
Allegories are only valid when used in the scope originally meant; deductions cannot be made from the allegory itself, only by proving it true in the original situation.This principle come into lay with physics all the time. In fact, the scientific process is founded on that principle: experiments shape hypotheses. Only by proving the hypotheses in all its intricacies - an impossible task given the limited knowledge of the scientist - can its infallibility be proven. Therefore, we conclude - in concert with scientists around the globe - we cannot prove a theory to be right, only to be wrong.
Physics vs. Mathematics
"Mathematicians don't believe it unless it is proven; Physicists believe it unless it is proven wrong...." Why such contrast within the field of science? While any physics class will precede with an in depth discussion of the uncertainty of physical laws, this philosophical discussion may bring better insight.
Mathematics
Mathematicians use mathematics to prove the laws of math. Geometry, for example, includes discussions of proofs to prove geometric laws. I conclude that no allegory is being used in mathematics... it is staying within the bounds of math to prove a mathematical concept.
Physics
Physics, however, is bridging from the empirical/perceived world into an allegory of hypotheses, theories, and laws.
Concluding Thoughts
What is physics analogous of?
No comments:
Post a Comment